sports &
entertainment TALENT & BUSINESS
MANAGEMENT
family office
STRATHMORE®

The Hidden Financial Playbook: How Top Athletes Structure Their Image Rights Companies
An inside look at the four most common image rights structures

1. The 4 Main Image Rights Models
1️⃣ The Personal Holding Company (PHC) Model
How it works: The athlete owns a company that licenses their image rights to sponsors and clubs.
Best for: Global superstars (e.g., Cristiano Ronaldo, LeBron James).
Tax benefit: Corporate tax rates (15-25%) vs. personal income tax (up to 50%+).
Example: Lionel Messi’s Messi Brands SL (Spain) manages his €100M+ endorsements.
2️⃣ The Joint Venture (JV) Model
How it works: The athlete shares image rights with their club/team (e.g., Real Madrid, NBA franchises).
Revenue split: Typically 50/50 or 60/40 (club/player).
Example: Jude Bellingham’s IRC shares revenue with Real Madrid.
3️⃣ The Offshore Licensing Model
How it works: The IRC is based in a low-tax jurisdiction (e.g., Gibraltar, Isle of Man).
Risk: Tax authorities (HMRC, IRS) increasingly challenge these structures.
Example: Neymar previously routed earnings through offshore entities before regulatory crackdowns.
4️⃣ The Trust & Estate Planning Model
How it works: The IRC is owned by a family trust for generational wealth.
Example: Lewis Hamilton’s IRC is linked to a UK trust for long-term asset protection.
2. Tax-Efficient Jurisdictions for IRCs
Jurisdiction
| Corporate Tax Rate
| Best For |
UK | 19-25% | Premier League players |
Switzerland | 12-15% | Tennis, Golf stars |
Gibraltar | 0% (non-resident) | Global footballers |
Delaware(USA) | 0% (if no ops) | NBA, NFL stars |
Netherlands | 15-25% | EU-based athletes |
⚠ Warning: Tax authorities now enforce "Substantial Presence" tests—shell companies face penalties.
3. Sport-Specific Considerations
⚽ Football (Soccer) Players
Many clubs demand partial ownership of image rights (e.g., Real Madrid’s 60/40 split).
Tax risk: Spanish & UK authorities audit aggressively.
🏀 NBA Stars
The NBA’s group licensing program takes 8-15% of certain earnings.
State taxes matter: Playing in Texas (0%) vs. California (13.3%) impacts net income.
🎾 Tennis & Golf Pros
Players typically own 100% of image rights.
Example: Roger Federer’s Tenro AG (Switzerland) managed $1B+ in endorsements.
4. Compliance Risks to Avoid
🚨 HMRC’s "50/50 Rule" (UK) – If an athlete isn’t a global star, only half their image rights income may qualify for corporate tax rates.
🚨 IRS "Subpart F" Rules (USA) – Offshore IRCs may trigger immediate US taxation.
🚨 Club vs. Player Disputes – Gareth Bale clashed with Real Madrid over Wales national team rights.
Key Takeaways
✅ Choose the right structure (PHC for solo stars, JV for team athletes).
✅ Pick tax-efficient jurisdictions carefully—Switzerland & Gibraltar work for some, but not all.
✅ Comply with league rules (NBA, UEFA, NFLPA have strict policies).
✅ Document everything—tax authorities demand proof of commercial legitimacy.
Strathmore works closely with leading tax and legal advisors on optimum structuring for client’s NIL rights.
#Sportsbusiness #AthleteBranding #ImageRights #NILRights